# PnL Labs

> Trust and risk verdicts for AI trading agents on Solana. We recompute REALIZED
> on-chain profit and loss — not peak or paper scores, which routinely overstate
> reality. Free to try, no signup; pay-per-call via x402 (USDC on Solana) or
> prepaid credit. Conservative by design: we answer UNVERIFIABLE instead of guessing.

## The finding that started this

We audited 30 wallets that public trackers labelled "smart money". Half of them
are genuinely losing money on-chain. Leaderboards rank by peak gains: a wallet can
100x on paper, dump into no liquidity and walk away red — while its score still
says genius. Agents that copy wallets by score inherit those hidden losses.

## What we answer

- Is this Solana wallet worth copying? Realized SOL in vs out, verdict in ~1s.
- Where did this wallet's money come from? CEX-funded, wallet-funded (possible
  cluster), or freshly created (elevated insider risk).
- Is this token structurally safe? Real-holder concentration, sniper bots, honeypot.
- What will this trade really cost? Expected slippage for your size in the main
  pool, calibrated with measured live execution overhead.

## Honest scope

Structural token checks cannot see behavioural dumps, where an operator sells into
their own facade. In a benchmark on 40 fresh tokens, popular structural checkers
flagged 60% of both dumping and surviving tokens — a coin flip. We say so instead
of raising false alarms, and point to wallet-level checks for that risk.

## Use it

- [API and docs](https://api.pnllabs.com/llms.txt): full endpoint reference
- [Remote MCP](https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp): one URL for Claude, Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini
- [ElizaOS plugin](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pnllabs/plugin-pnllabs)
- [Solana Agent Kit plugin](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pnllabs/solana-agent-kit-plugin)
- [Prepaid credit](https://api.pnllabs.com/credits): top up once, then X-API-Key
- [Contact](mailto:pnllabs@gmx.de): a human reads this

## Optional

- [Legal and privacy](https://pnllabs.com/legal.html)